I have to say I like the new feature and being able to avoid loading the same patch twice, even as an expert, so I guess a flag or something that allows us to configure this is fine.

Em sáb, 22 de set de 2018 às 13:30, Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu> escreveu:

Ah, yes, a fourth option: have a new "pd really-open" message to open
a file without checking if it's a duplicate.

cheers
M

On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 06:18:42PM +0200, IOhannes m zm??lnig wrote:
> On 9/22/18 3:17 PM, katja wrote:
> > Much to my alarm, Pd 0.49test3 prevents loading multiple instances of
> > a patch, and release notes tell us that this is on purpose.
>
>
> funnily, i recently worked on a related regression where double-clicking
> on a Pd-patch (in your favourite Windows exploder) would start a new
> instance of Pd (rather than switching to the current instance and
> raising the patch if already opened).
>
> note however, that this regression (fix) is unrelated to what you are
> describing.
>
> and i agree that it should be possible to open the same patch multiple
> times. esp. on a programmatic layer (that is: by sending messages to Pd).
> i guess, when opening an already opened patch from the menu (Ctrl-O), Pd
> could *ask* whether this is really intended.
>
>
>
> gkmdsar
> IOhannes
>




> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list