I also run across another thread http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg37440.html which states that [mtx_mul~] has been deprecated. Yet, deprecated objects are needed to be able to instantiate their replacements. What gives?
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Michal Seta mis@artengine.ca wrote:
Hmmm... I run across this thread when searching for information about [mtx_*~]. If I load iemmatrix and I instantiate [matrix~] it tells me that it is deprecated and please replace by [mtx_*~]. Which is fine until I save, quit Pd and reopen the patch after which [mtx_*~] is no longer available until I again instantiate the deprecated [matrix~] again. Following the advice given in this thread I created a [mtx_mul~] and it seems to behave the same as [mtx_*~]. Yet, [mtx_*~] alone is impossible to use. The rationale of this feature escapes me.
Is it safe to use [mtx_mul~] (i.e. it will not become deprecated sometime in the foreseeable future in favour of its * brother)?
Thanks
./MiS
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:20 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
Max wrote:
where is [mtx_*]?
it's in iemmatrix.
i've loaded iemmatrix and iem_matrix
try instantiating [mtx_mul]. afterwards you might be able to use [mtx_*] directly.
gfmadr IOhannes
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list