On 11/26/08, Thomas Grill gr@grrrr.org wrote:
hmmm, how about
[inlet] | [t a b] | / |
| [200] [300] [400] | | | | [pack 0 0 0 0] | [outlet]It's a pity that pack is not settable...
If I understand you correctly on this, Thomas, if it were "settable", wouldn't each use of that [pack] reset the values that it would use for the defaults? I thought that was the whole point of the problem?
Mike
gr~~~
Am 26.11.2008 um 00:22 schrieb Frank Barknecht:
Hallo,
inspired by Sylvain attached is an extended assignment for extra points. ;)
Ciao
Frank
Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Sylvain Le Beux hat gesagt: // Sylvain Le Beux wrote:
ok, well sorry. I just take the assignment as it, where you wrote "a list" and "too short". Thought you were making teh statement general, and lists were here just as example. anyway, that was fun playing.
You're right in that the length of the list in the assignment is an arbitrary choice and ideally a solution would extend to larger lists as well. But any solution would have to be adapted to a certain list length. I guess at least, but maybe someone proves me wrong? ;)
Ciao
Frank
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
<pd-exam-02.pd>_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list