Thomas Grill wrote:
Hey all, vst~ is not a secret, it's in cvs. It seems that also the Steinberg copyright issues have become better due to the efforts of the FST project. The problem is that it always takes some time to make a release package and i use to do that when things have been tested to some extent. The last time someone mentioned the need for vst~ on the list i posted a call for vst~ test reports of all kinds of available plugins. I didn't get one single reply - that can mean that either nobody uses vst~ or it's not working at all or it's working perfectly. So here again... i'd appreciate _very_ much reports of vst~ with all kinds of plugins - perfectly working/somehow working (details) /not working at all (errors?). The other reason for not publishing a binary was a change in the architecture, so that a OSX version (and maybe linux FST version) can follow. I'll upload a binary shortly.
i'll test it then and put comments on http://pd.iem.at/pdwiki/index.php?Vst~ (and post it to the list)