They all operate on binbufs internally, so there shouldn't be a significant performance difference.
I guess the advantage is if it runs faster or not, right?
Em sáb., 6 de fev. de 2021 às 18:03, Christof Ressi <info@christofressi.com> escreveu:
> are there any concrete advantages?
What's the advantage of having two different objects for the same job?
If you like [textfile] for its simple interface, keep using it. I'm just
saying that it's more or less obsolete.
On 06.02.2021 16:38, João Pais wrote:
> It is surely overall more powerful. But when using it just for
> read/get whole lines/save, are there any concrete advantages?
>
>
>> [text define] is basically a more powerful and flexible replacement
>> for [textfile] and [qlist]. I would only use [textfile] if you prefer
>> the simpler interface or need the [add2( method. Personally, I only
>> use [text define].
>>
>> Christof
>>
>> On 06.02.2021 14:28, João Pais wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> for simple read/get/save operation, are there are advantages on
>>> using [text define] instead of [textfile]?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> jmmmp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list