The problem is I've already written my patch for a delay line =) 

I also read that tables have some latency when using them in loopers (what I am doing) because they can only write in block size. I was about to switch to using tables and then I read this...

On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 6:38 AM, tim vets <timvets@gmail.com> wrote:


2010/10/17 Peter Plessas <plessas@mur.at>

tim vets wrote:
2010/10/17 Tyler Leavitt <thecryoflove@gmail.com>

http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg00287.html

I googled my question and came up with this thread... considering it was 4
years old I figured maybe someone out there had a fresh solution...

I need to clear a delay that I have written via delwrite~. Is there any way
to do this yet?

Yes, let me chime into this topic! I also come accross situations where I need to clear a delay buffer, and I was looking for a message like
"; const 0"
which can be use to clear tables. And, yes, it needs to be a delay, not a table.

so what is it you can do with a delay that you can't with tabread~, tabwrite~ and a table?
gr,
Tim

 

Looking forward to suggestions!



tabwrite~ ?
Tim


Tyler
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list