i was trying to say that you are obviously not trying to run a native
64bit system (with a 64bit kernel and running Pd as 64bit application)the good thing about amd64/emt64 is, that they can also run 32bit (i386).
anyhow, if you want to run Pd in as a native 64bit app, you will need
Pd-0.41
ah, that not yet. it should take a while until I get to that (if I do).
after all, if you don't need all the list-stuff and
multiple-dollarg-expansion ($1-$2), you might as well not notice a
difference between 0.39 and 0.40....I can't even be sure of what you're talking about, so probably I don't
(or maybe I would, if I was aware of it?). Were they properly
documented somewhere?it's not necessarily a matter of documentation (though both have been
discussed on this list so many times, that at least the list-archives
should serve well as documentation :-)). what i wanted to say is, that
if you don't care for any _new_ feature, then it is clear that you will
not see a difference between a version w/ and one lacking these features.
I brought the documentation up, because I'm not aware of the newest
features that should make me (or anyone?) choose one version to the other
(having not had to stolper on them during work). I can spend the whole
afternoon looking in the list for fragments of opinios, but is that really
a viable solution?
you mentioned 64bit, and the other things, do you know of any place where
to find a small reference about that? now I am curious. I usually update
the version anyway, but more for sport than after a carefully-pondered
reflexion (in the case of Pd).
their time [please don't bring up the "if they would really want it..."
argument]. pd-van should check that out and try to catch up at some timei am not trying to start another religious war here.
me neither. I just see that kind of reply over and over, and I add this
disclaimer now and then, just to make sure.