On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 18:34 +0000, Florian Hollerweger wrote:
i never understood, why [timer] is giving different values from the ones that you expected, when connected to a [bang~] inside a re-blocked subpatch. would be cool to have that either explained or declared as a bug.
Sorry, Roman - could you clarify which blocksizes you are talking about? What Peter and I have observed is that block sizes < 64 give the same [timer] results as a block size of 64, so there seems to be a lower limit. I am not sure though whether you are you talking about the same phenomenon?
yo, this is what i was talking about. in a subpatch with a lower blocksize than 64, [bang~] still outputs a bang only every 64 samples.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de