Hi,
The great advantage of using linux is that we can have a choice of installed applications. If there are many computers to setup and if ubuntustudio is compatible with all the computers, the gain of installing time would be so relevant. On a single computer, I don't see the point of installing all the stuff from DVD or META-PACKAGE, if it's about using less than ten per cent of the proposed applications, all the stuff inside this distribution is well documented, why not just taking what is needed?
husk a écrit :
PSPunch escribió:
What do you think might be the better approach, to use ubuntu normal, or
ubuntustudio? Roman told me that for a while there's no big difference,
because the -rt kernel comes with ubuntu. Is ubuntustudio more than a
bundle of software with nice backgrounds? (Note: I'll use the same setup
on both computers, so the system should work on 64 and 32b).As far as I know, "Studio" is just plain Ubuntu that comes with a set of
software relevant to audio & video.
They use different kernel. Ubutustudio have a specific kernel for real time, and maybe (I'm not sure) a problem with firewire bus. my two cents Husk
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list