Hi Peter,<div><br></div><div>What abstraction are you trying to use? </div><div><br></div><div>Frank would obviously be best person to answer your question as he made it. </div><div><br></div><div>Can you attach the patch so I can have a look?</div>

<div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Joe<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 11 March 2011 16:42, Peter Kirn <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:peter@createdigitalmedia.net">peter@createdigitalmedia.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Hi Joe,<br>
Okay, I&#39;m now certain that what&#39;s going wrong is entirely in the<br>
abstraction being made polyphonic - and it isn&#39;t, as I thought,<br>
u_dispatch with symbols or lists; that&#39;s fine.<br>
<br>
For instance, if I replace the example for u_makepoly, using s_buzz in<br>
place of s_rhodey, I get similar answers. So I must not entirely<br>
understand what prerequisite there is for the patch being made<br>
polyphonic. I tried to ape s_rhodey before, adding two inlets and one<br>
signal outlet (two signal outlets could be used for stereo, of<br>
course), and adding:<br>
1. u_dispatch in order to pass additional arguments (beyond the<br>
two-float list processed as the note event, etc.)<br>
2. u_loader to instantiate the patch itself<br>
<br>
But maybe I&#39;m missing another step?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Peter<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>