On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 20:30 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
i hoped, that i can get rid of the startup options with [declare], so that pd doesn't need additional flags for running netpd. but this means, that it is not possible (or i need to add a [declare] in every patch and every abs, which is a bit awkward).
Recursive declares could be a problem, if you'd use an abstraction, that in turn needs a different declare, possibly with a nameclash.
Say you'd want to use Cyclone's counter and "declare -lib cyclone". An abstraction you use may want to use cxc's counter. With recursive declares, this could generate a nameclash in that abstraction.
A way out would be a hierarchical system for declares, but that's even farther.
Ciao
hm, it's not that i wanted to use [declare]'s inside abstractions and it turned out, that it is not necessary at all (at least for what i want). but every patch needs a [declare -path], whereas only one (the first loaded) patch needs a [declare -lib]. i find that inconsistent.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de