On 10/07/2014 08:51 PM, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
> I attached the patch.
thanks.
for the future, it would be welcome if you only attached the pd-patch.
the png does not add any additional information, might not show the
actual problem and is (in the specific case) about 80 times bigger than
the pd-patch.
> I understand what is the problem, but I don't have
> the real solution for this. I want to know how to prevent this situation.
>
my ascii-art patch should have given you the clue:
>>>
>>>
>>> |
>>> | +------+
>>> [f] |
>>> | |
>>> [+ 1] |
>>> | |
>>> [% 6] |
>>> | |
>>> [t f f] |
>>> | +--+
>>> |
>>>
#0 use trigger whenever you want to connect a single outlet to multiple
inlets (this is general advice, and is not related to your *current*
problem)
#1 keep the [% 6] in the loop. it will make sure that the number that is
incremented will never get into the problematic range (even if you force
it to a too-high value (e.g. by sending a large number directly into the
counter) it will bring the values down to an operable range and thus
"magically" fix the problem in the next iteration.
gfmasdr
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list