On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 14:33 -0500, vade wrote:
Yeah, giving people a CHOICE is certainly condescending, what the f*!@?
calm down. i have the impression, that you completely misunderstood matju's point. or am i misunderstanding something? i think, he meant, that for (lazy) devs it is easier to find a ('condescending') reason to not implement a certain feature than just implementing straight away.
it seems to me, that you both are on the same track.. :-)
roman
please calm down. i think, that is exactly what matju meant
On Dec 5, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
If the people want it, why not give it to them?
Because it's easier to write a condescending justification for the
lack of segmented patchcords than to write the code for segmented
patchcords.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de