On 28/09/12 16:23, Miller Puckette wrote:
Well, I'm persuadable on this front. I'm concerned with unduly hogging the object namespace - in general, every time I add an object name I potentially introduce incompatiblities with someone's abstraction that might have the same name. And there are 50 or so new classes (!) to provide. I don't even have a list yet (no pun intended)
Perhaps it would be better to refactor the object / abstraction / binary / loading / namespace mechanism first, something along the lines of an old discussion I had with HCS:
http://claudiusmaximus.goto10.org/cm/2010-07-16_pure-data_libraries_conversa...
Once that is fixed to something less baroque/crufty then it should be easier for everyone to go nuts and have their own namespaces without clobbering or hogging anything, and make patches more portable between Pd variants.
I have no time to work on this for the forseeable future, but it's something that needs doing sooner rather than later...
cheers M
Thanks,