On Tuesday 18 March 2003 05:29, guenter geiger wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Larry Troxler wrote:
On Monday 17 March 2003 08:59, guenter geiger wrote:
Hi Larry,
thanks for reporting the problem. Could it be that pd gets stuck because it loads all the libraries ? I have just tested the setup and pd works with the latest CVS version of jack .. I am a bit at a loss at this one :(
Guenter
Hello Guenter - I tried today's CVS of jack and have the same result. Which version of pd are you using? I'm using pd 0.36-0 directly from the CCRMA binary RPM. (I did try last night to compile PD from CVS but it seems the build is/was broken - failed at fiddle~).
Yes, I am using the version from CVS. I resolved my problem, there was a bug in the jack packages that allowed me to have jackd 0.51 and libjack 0.50 isntalled.
I think your problem comes from binary incompatibilities, so you have to recompile.
If this means that Jack is still at the stage that I need to get the source code for every single application that I use that's jack-aware, I think I might need to cut my losses at this point. Who the H*#& has this much free time on their hands?
But to Jack's credit, I don't think anyone on their development team suggested it was ready for general use, so I can't complain.
Can you report why your compile fails with fiddle~ ?
Well unfortunately I didn't save the warnings (they were warnings that halted the build because we use -Werror).
One thing was, is that I didn't realize that the default CVS branch isn't actually the latest version. So I don't know if the fiddle build also fails on on the devel_36_0 version, since when I realized my mistake I checked out that version but hacked the makefile at the same time.
Actually, if you are at the stage of compiling fiddle there should already be a pd in ../bin/pd Just try that and look what it does.
Greetings,
Guenter