> "env~" seems incomplete to me if it's

> only going to compute RMS.

Glad you feel how I do :)

But wondering where you'd be stuck at, seems like something not too complicated. Anyway, waiting for it someday ;)

Why not an abstraction in my point of view? Well, looks kinda cumbersome for that particular goal.

Cheers

2014-03-09 18:30 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com>:

On Son, 2014-03-09 at 14:05 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
> By the way - I just looked, and you can save a great deal of trouble
> using the "array max" object (new in Pd 0.25)

You mean 0.45, I guess(?)

> - no need for 'until'
> horror.

Oh, that is great! Thanks for the reminder, I haven't looked at [array]
yet.

> But "env~" seems incomplete to me if it's only going to compute
> RMS.

Yeah, I see your and Alexandre's point: Why not extending [env~]?

Roman

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list