Ah, thanks for the explanation...
Mike
On 11/26/08, Thomas Grill gr@grrrr.org wrote:
Am 26.11.2008 um 09:20 schrieb Mike McGonagle:
On 11/26/08, Thomas Grill gr@grrrr.org wrote:
hmmm, how about
[inlet] | [t a b] | / |
| [200] [300] [400] | | | | [pack 0 0 0 0] | [outlet]It's a pity that pack is not settable...
If I understand you correctly on this, Thomas, if it were "settable", wouldn't each use of that [pack] reset the values that it would use for the defaults? I thought that was the whole point of the problem?
i meant that if one could use a [set 0 200 300 400( message for pack, that would be shorter than three individual default numbers 200,300,400. gr~~~