Wow, my email client never showed me that this email got an answer.
@Domain: For me it was something much slower, such as smoothing a 50fps signal or so. But it could be applied at dsp block level i guess, and suited for audio. Let me start with a basic "number" version, than if works we upgrade.
So, Charles, if there is no kalman, I'll be happy to code one (I can only do pure C, abstractions take more time for me). Lets see how it goes, and I'll publish it if it becomes usable - likely during over this period some call Christmas. This also mean I might get back to my dtw patch (presented at weimar), which some people (Marco, Koray, others?) were interested in - but that one needs double the work to become (even mildy) user-friendly.
best
pedro
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Charles Henry
<czhenry@gmail.com> wrote:
I think that's a good idea. I've wanted to do this (another one of those projects that I couldn't accomplish right now).
I had in mind, noise reduction for recording--given that it only removes stationary correlated noise, it would be good for scrubbing the noise floor.
Or--did you have in mind something much slower, to clean up the noise in measurements from a different kind of sensor?
Also, do you want to program it as an external in C, or as an abstraction in Pd?
--
Pedro Lopes (HCI Researcher / MSc)
contact:
pedro.lopes@ist.utl.ptwebsite:
http://web.ist.utl.pt/pedro.lopes /
http://pedrolopesresearch.wordpress.com/ |
http://twitter.com/plopesresearch