Hey Frank,
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Small correction: The panner doesn't pan correctly. Attached is a fix.
Help me out here, cause I've been using that particular dirty-but-quick panner construction for years now. What is the difference between your version and mine? Seems like they both give a range from 0-1 to the left channel and the inverse of that to the right channel.
If I were less lazy, I'd go for an equal-loudness curve of course. But that's not what you fixed.
d.