On Nov 23, 2020, at 12:00 PM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:22:49 +0100
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig@iem.at>
To: pd-list@lists.iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] Pd 64 bits precision "for real"?
Message-ID: <57e459d6-e8d1-516c-da37-af88912aaf21@iem.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed

On 11/23/20 12:25 AM, Martin Peach wrote:

It should be named dppd to avoid confusion imho.

or pddp (or is that already taken?)

when csound switched to double precision they renamed things to 
"csound64" (with "things" being at least the libraries that hold the 
engine).

so i like pd64 better, as it is obvious that this is still Pd (and not 
just some nice palindromic acronym).

but anyhow, yes: we probably need a catchy name.

fgmadsr
IOhannes