I've been thinking about some sort of such extention of loadbang - also to allow you to specify the message, as in "loadbang 5" - I think that would get a lot of use. But I don't have a solid sense of what the design should be (and am always afraid of implementing something before I understand all the issues; if I do something stupid then its there forever :)
Miller
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 08:44:25PM +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote:
Or [loadbang] could have a second outlet for init bangs...
On Oct 22, 2017, at 7:35 PM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
I can think of an easier solution that doesn't even require another Pd object: [loadbang] could take a non zero argument to turn it into [initbang]. That'd be so easy to implement that even I could do it... (it's just action = LB_INIT instead of LB_LOAD). This would also be backwards compatible, of course. I could even go ahead and make a PR for that.
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list