Hallo, Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote:
Frank, if you have a few moments, could you explain a little about how this wiring works in [polypoly]? I see in the [pd init] subpatch of [polypoly] where the connections are made, but I don't understand why the first inlet goes only to the current [poly]-selected voice, while the second goes to all second inlets of all the cloned abstractions.
It's hard to envision what the final patch would look like, or why it would look that way, at least.Hm, I think, you're misreading the automatically generated instances of the wrapper abstractions a bit. You'll probably see it a bit better if you move around the abstractions in [pd $0-poly] a bit, otherwise the patchcords and objects are on top of each other.
Ah, sorry, ignore this above. You have a correct understanding of the wiring already. The additional thing is this: Inside of [polywrap] there's a [route $2] which filters out only the messages whose first element matches the voice number. The voice number is automatically generated by [poly]!
Matching messages are sent to the actual custom abstraction. The non-matching messages are sent further along the first outlet to the next [polywrap] where another [route] is waiting for the correct voice number and so it goes on.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__