On 2/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">chris clepper</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:cgclepper@gmail.com">cgclepper@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<span class="q">On 2/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Item State</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:itemstatechanged@yahoo.de" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">itemstatechanged@yahoo.de</a>&gt; wrote:
</span><div><span class="q"><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>it seems also that pix_film doesn&#39;t &quot;fire&quot; events when<br>sending the same frame number repeatedly into the<br>right inlet (like if i switch on the metro in attached<br>patch, nothing happens).</blockquote>

</span><div><br>What you describe is gloriously inefficient since the frame has been decoded, processed and sent to the GPU already.&nbsp; </div></div></blockquote><div><br>And I forgot to add: try pix_buf and see if it does what you want.
<br></div><br></div><br>