that seems quite nicer than [hip~], cool. 

I rewrote it to make it more concise with expr.

cheers

2015-01-30 19:29 GMT-02:00 katja <katjavetter@gmail.com>:

Attached patch illustrates how [iemlib/hp1~] is calculated. This gives
a perfect hipass, [hip~] could (or should) be done the same way I
guess.

Katja

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres
<porres@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This message of mine was intended to be a bug report
>
> I see, but my point is that it's not much of a "bug", so if you want to see
> how these filters work more deeply, you may check my stuff.
>
> You can see how I made versions of the filters as [fexpr~] or [biquad~] and
> the raw filters. I made [vcf~] out of [cpole~], for example. And you can
> check the plot of magnitude/phase.
>
>> I know (and enjoy very much) yours
>> Computer Music With Examples In Pd.
>
> Thanks. That got old though... I translated from portuguese what I had for a
> workshop at the last pd convention in 2011, but it's mostly FFT. My current
> portuguese version is way bigger, up to 250 examples in the next release I'm
> planning for next month. These patches I'm sharing is from my newest
> releases.
>
>> Probably it would be better then to warn users
>> about this limit of ~12 kHz in the help-files then.
>
> Yeah, it'd be good to point out a bit of its characteristics. I learned a
> lot by checking on my own.
>
> I could realize how [bp~] is quite similar to the resonant lowpass from
> [lores~] for example. Its just a matter of setting up the gain. If you set
> [bp~]'s Q to 1, you'll also see how it behaves much like a lowpass filter
> like [lop~]. The [vcf~] filter has similar characteristics.
>
> cheers
>
> 2015-01-30 0:19 GMT-02:00 Gilberto Agostinho
> <gilbertohasnofb@googlemail.com>:
>
>> Hi Alexandre, thanks for your reply.
>>
>> On 30/01/15 02:39, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
>>
>> it's how the filters were designed, they're not perfect throughout the
>> spectrum
>>
>>
>> Probably it would be better then to warn users about this limit of ~12 kHz
>> in the help-files then.
>>
>> you'll need to use/build other filters for that purpose of working with
>> that higher portion of the spectrum (in which I can hardly still hear, by
>> the way)/
>>
>>
>> Hmm, I can clearly hear the difference between feeding a high frequency to
>> [vcf~] and to [bp~] using a large enough Q (~100 for instance). With that Q,
>> try sweeping from 12kHz until 14kHz in both filters, and you'll hear that
>> [vcf~] behaves as expected, while [bp~] does not change the frequency but
>> only affects the amplitude of the output for some reason.
>>
>> a few of patches of mine that describe the behaviour of vanilla and some
>> extended filters
>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the patches, but I am actually aware of [vcf~] and
>> [biquad~]. This message of mine was intended to be a bug report rather than
>> a cry for help as I have no particular problem with filters needing a
>> solution right now. But in any case I will check your patches, as I know
>> (and enjoy very much) yours Computer Music With Examples In Pd.
>>
>> Take care,
>> Gilberto Agostinho
>
>
>

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>