> or you could build your own [qlist] based on [text]...
> no need to change the old and rusty code of the original [qlist].I get the workaround, but [qlist] is built for sequencing and simpler for that (like, it can easily set the tempo), and I still think it wouldn't hurt to make it more flexible. It'd be totally backwards compatible.Although I assume I don't think I get the hassle it'd be to do that. I'm still struggling to see what could be so tricky to make "$0" possible to work in messages, sorry :Pcheers2014-04-02 13:50 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig@iem.at>:
On 04/02/2014 05:43 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:or you could build your own [qlist] based on [text]...no need to change
>> See also the 'text' object in 0.45 that does $ expansion :)
>
> on it ;)
>
> Now, so it seems, at least [qlist] could be upgarded any time to do the
> expansion, right? That wouldn't hurt, would it?
the old and rusty code of the original [qlist].
dsar
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list