This message stems from auvi (A group that has developed a series of MAX objects based on NATO) about how the delt with a particular licencing situation.
sorry Miller, I could not resist:
Hope it might be worth the laugh.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 10:32:42 +0200 From: artclay artclay@netsurfer.ch To: 55@bek.no Subject: Re: /55\auv-i warning
auvi
you are still max dependent. is it not nice that they are just letting you use there software without even issuung those idoitic question you have posed since your little objects have been put up?
you are not on the top of the food chain you just a couple of worms in the miller pucketts intestines
arrt
"auv-i.de" wrote:
John DeKron: this should have been private, but unfortunetly, _you chose to make it a public issue.
So why does auvi then put it like this:
"I have looked at your standalone + thought about what kind of arrangement we could make. Unfortunetly, I do not think it is possible to give you permission to use the Auvi objects in a commercial product.
Auvi will be releasing a product that would be aiming for a similar market (it is not something Max-based). So it does not make sense for Auvi to promote a product like your standalone at this time."
This means: DeKron indicated he wishes to sell Auvi-ness to production houses, which does not fit with some of Auvi's future plans.
If Auvi ever intended to release a VJ app, it would have happened long ago.
After some days where you had put it like this:
"We will need to work out an arrangement for a commercial license, before you are permitted to release a commercial Auvi standalone.
If we are able to do this - Auvi would be happy to support/encourage/promote your application to insure its massive success."
That was written before Auvi saw your standalone.
You are well aware that you do not touch the point of my posting and you are well aware why.
John DeKron: I am sorry, but the truth is: Your application is not much more than 10 Auvi help files cut-n-pasted together. You even left the help file text for 242.sympathy in your interface.
You are flattering yourself if you think anything in your application is even the least bit useful or interesting to Auvi.
What is the problem? Auvi simply didn't like your application. Why not just move on?
It's unfortunate that some people feel the best way to deal with rejection is by kicking and screaming and throwing things.
From 55-admin@bek.no Fri Jul 26 06:58:46 2002 Received: from fe1 (fe1.ryerson.ca [141.117.101.22]) by hopper.ryerson.ca (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6QAwkq04498 for <@hopper.ryerson.ca:bbogart@ryerson.ca>; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 06:58:46 -0400 Received: from plot.bek.no (plot.bek.no [158.37.56.10]) by fe1.ryerson.ca (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002)) with ESMTP id 0GZU003J3RV56C@fe1.ryerson.ca for bbogart@ryerson.ca (ORCPT bbogart@acs.ryerson.ca); Fri, 26 Jul 2002 06:59:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from plot.bek.no (IDENT:mail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plot.bek.no (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA02136; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 13:35:52 +0200 Received: from hotmail.com (f46.law12.hotmail.com [64.4.19.46]) by plot.bek.no (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA02120 for 55@bek.no; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 13:35:50 +0200 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 03:54:51 -0700 Received: from 213.22.29.109 by lw12fd.law12.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 10:54:51 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 10:54:51 +0000 From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Gertr=FAdis?= Callosidad gertrudiscallosidad@hotmail.com Subject: Re: /55\power of now X-Originating-IP: [213.22.29.109] Sender: 55-admin@bek.no To: 55@bek.no Errors-to: 55-admin@bek.no Reply-to: 55@bek.no Message-id: F46JNKG36OKXZgkGCY30001cf46@hotmail.com MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: 55@bek.no X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta2 List-Id: <55.bek.no> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jul 2002 10:54:51.0376 (UTC) FILETIME=[DDF92F00:01C23492]
memories
a lot of text for a short time
world will allways welcome lovers
maybe nn is feeling 'old pain' but joshua isn't but maybe nn is acting to feel old pain
world will allways welcome lovers
or nn is doing it the Eckhart Tolle's way and joshua is doing the Arthur Janov's way
world will allways welcome lovers
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com