Hi list!, PiDiP In my humble opinion is a great tool for video work, a complement to or Gem or Gridflow and actually doing would be a shame to stay out of pd extended.
I like the possibilities of interaction and partnership with OpenCV ... is a penalty if it is not in pd, but is also addressing the problem of licenses.
Best regards
José
2010/12/7 Derek Holzer derek@umatic.nl:
What is there exactly in PiDiP that people need so badly? The (IMHO ugly) video filters from EffecTV? Or the streaming part?
In either case, the solution seems simple to me. PDP itself isn't really being maintained AFAIK, and isn't completely cross-platform anyways, so why not just implement what is needed from PiDiP in GEM?
If there is a (willfully) stubborn stone in the river, just fork and move around it! And one less reason to put up with a certain person's temper-tantrums later...
D.
On 12/7/10 1:56 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Currently pidip is in a state where the two licenses conflict irreconcilably. So if you use pidip under Yves' license, you could be sued by the EffecTV copyright holder. Or if you use it under the GPL from EffecTV, you could be sued by the PiDiP copyright holder.
-- ::: derek holzer ::: http://macumbista.net ::: ---Oblique Strategy # 131: "Question the heroic approach"
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list