Yeah, might as well be just that :) Nonetheless, in slop~, you have a "linear region" and the other inlets that are "asymptotic". So if you have "0" for the 3th/5th inlets and the same input value for asymptotic upwards/downwards region, you basically have a "simple" one pole filter. More precisely, something that could be implemented with fexpr~ as:

[fexpr~ $y1 + (($x1-$y1) * $f2)], where $f2 is the cuttof frequency in radians per sample.

At least that's where I got when I tried to simplify this down.

My point is that you can achieve this kind of filtering which is quite different than a slew limiter. But then, could it be a misappropriation of the object? Like, is this there not to be used on its own, but in conjunction with other parameters?

But one way or another, seems I should really change the name of my "slew" object :) 

thanks