This conversation comes up again and again (I've been the culprit a couple of times myself), and everyone has a different opinion. I personally think it's a tragedy that CCRMA decided to base their Planet CCRMA distro on RedHat, which many agree is an unwieldy distro ill-suited to real-time audio work. Debian based distros like Ubuntu, DeMuDi and dynebolic are much leaner & meaner. However, I can confirm that it looks like DeMuDi (as of relatively recently) is no longer maintained, so I agree that you're best off running a "pure" Ubuntu system, albeit with some modifications...
Ubuntu is great because everything mostly works "out of the box." You can get things done right away while you're learning to use it. But as you've probably already learned, most Linux distros are not very audio-friendly, for several reasons. Linux can be a very effective OS for audio, but first you have to get your hands dirty, and if you're new to Linux this can be a bit intimidating. Lots of info you find by googling around is old & obsolete. What I wish I had when I first started:
-This will tell you all you need to know about setting up your ubuntu box for audio use. Follow these instructions, and your life will be much saner.
-These people can help with all your questions relating to getting your system set up, if you run into difficulty
Hopefully, this message will be one for the archives...
Good luck!
David
On 2/16/06, derek holzer <derek@x-i.net> wrote:
My suggestion would be to use Ubuntu to get a basic installation, and
add the DeMuDi packages on top of that. Ubuntu should streamline the
hardware detection & configuration process quite nicely. The DeMuDi
packages could be part of Debian (Unstable/Testing?) already, so it's
just a matter of updating the sources you download from.
Fedora is nice but very bloated, and not all the PD externals are there
yet. And RedHat/Fedora do things in their own special way, which can
make it difficult for non Fedora-users to help you out. OTOH Debian is
pretty standard, and shares many similarities with a lot of other
distros, so you can find help in a lot more forums, etc.
Dynebolic is OK as a live CD, but pretty much impossible to reconfigure,
so I'd skip it for a permanent installation unless you need something
working RIGHT NOW ;-)
good luck,
d.
Renato Fabbri wrote:
> I´m migrating from windows to linux, but to which
> distro?
> I intend using PD, sequencers and softsynths.
>
> A friend highly recommended fedora core 4 and the
> ccrma pack, but I heard about GeeXboX, dyne:bolic, and
> DeMuDi, which all are called "multimedia distros"..
--
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
---Oblique Strategy # 193:
[blank card]
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at
mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list