----- Original Message -----
From: IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at To: pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:04 AM Subject: Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork first stable release now available
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2013-01-15 04:58, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
The k12 stuff looks promising.
Playing around with it I wondered what would happen if you just did everything in the signal domain-- even for the values coming from the controllers by, say, using a [sig~] right before sending to the outlet of the abstraction. The only thing that would bea dilemma is the counter but without objects for conditional branching
you might want to check out chun lee's fantastic live coding performances (and his paper on that [1]).
If you look at k12 you'll see he doesn't currently have control objects for branching, so that means the counter is not currently so useful. It's not so big a deal to remove it without explicitly replacing it with something in the signal domain.
But to actually add signal domain abstractions that can perform the function of a control domain counter is quite difficult. What is it you have in mind? Lee's counters AFAICT are analogous to [metro]--[f]x[+ 1] and variations on it; that's good for sequencing but not for triggering events (based on input which may come periodically, aperiodically, or even never).
-Jonathan
fgmasdr IOhannes
[1] http://www.uni-weimar.de/medien/wiki/PDCON:Conference/Music_in_expression_-_... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlD1DXoACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvT3YgCgybtdD/f8JZbjCJUfrtQsL39/ +U8AoKPOfIq/fYszsNHL6gfbxwIOwZzA =RCPd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list