Le 2011-11-18 à 10:16:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
This is more like iemguts: properties of abstractions. Jonathan's proposal includes that, but also global things. IMHO, iemguts is the most Pd-ish because its a library of simple objects rather than a single absattr mega-object with attributes (Max/MSP style) or messages via send/receive.
Is the goal to make pd easier to use for complex problems, or is the goal to create lots of tiny classes for the sake of ideology ?
I don't mind small classes and I do have problems with certain huge classes being huge (in Max) and bundling lots of things that they could outsource, but [absattr-sub] doesn't look like one.
Do you also think that [expr] should be avoided, for the sake of making simple objects ? [expr] is a complex thing with complex syntax.
| Mathieu BOUCHARD ----- téléphone : +1.514.383.3801 ----- Montréal, QC