here's a quick example with throw~ and catch~

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 23:48 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I think the way you'd do it to prevent glitches is to have them in
> subpatches, always attached, and then turn them on and off with a [*~]
> and a [switch~].

How are you gonna patch this without creating DSP loops?

Roman


> On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:44 PM, patrick wrote:
>
> > hi everyone,
> >
> > i would like to make a patch with multiple fx~ _but_ is it possible to
> > chain the fx~ and change the order without a single glitch in the dsp.
> > as an example:
> >
> > [adc~]
> > |
> > [reverb~]
> > |
> > [distortion~]
> > |
> > [dac~]
> >
> > now pressing a bang and automagically:
> >
> > [adc~]
> > |
> > [distortion~]
> > |
> > [reverb~]
> > |
> > [dac~]
> >
> > is it possible in pd?
> > thanks,
> > pat
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "[W]e have invented the technology to eliminate scarcity, but we are
> deliberately throwing it away to benefit those who profit from
> scarcity."        -John Gilmore
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list