On Sep 22, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Marco Donnarumma wrote:

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

It would be great if you could add other libs to that page that are not currently included in Pd-extended, things like Gridflow, pix_opencv, pdp_opencv, sssad, etc.

What's the difference between "frameworks" and "graphics" ?

What's the criteria for calling something a framework ?

These questions, I don't know the answer to, IOhannes set those up. I personally think they are gratitious and should be removed.  I think we should have:

* distributions
* applications (curently stand-alone products)
* libraries and externals (maybe just call it libraries)
* GUI plugins

And drop frameworks and graphics.

Why is every version of Gem listed separately in the boxes ?

I guess it shows each release if it needs to fill the box.

Ok, but how can we define which library has to be listed there and which not?

for example, Dan has a nice set of objects, could his library be listed?
or we talk about externals only...

All libraries that are ready for release should be listed there, IMHO.  I don't see a reason to exclude any as long its ready for people to download and use.

.hc

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to realize his wishes.  Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish.    -William Carlos Williams