On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Miller Puckette <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:msp@ucsd.edu" target="_blank">msp@ucsd.edu</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">


I could be wrong, but I believe the Beagleboard is ARMv7 and the Pi is<br>
ARM v6 - so BB could easily have twice the floating-point erformance of<br>
Pi.  I&#39;m not sure why and whether there would be any difference in Jack<br>
for the two.  I believe (but am not sure at all) that BB doesn&#39;t have the<br>
same USB problems the Pi has.  All in all it&#39;s still a very attractive<br>
possibliity, perticularly since the Stanford people have tested and exercised<br>
it thoroughly.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, BB has a _LOT_ better performance than RasPi ..</div><div><br></div><div>Btw, if you want a cheaper board with BB like performance but RasPi like price, look at Cubieboard .. ( <a href="http://cubieboard.org/" target="_blank">http://cubieboard.org/</a> ) </div>


<div><br></div><div>--</div><div>buZz</div></div>