On Dec 5, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Enrique Erne hat gesagt: // Enrique Erne wrote:
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Ah, these are even better. Do you mind if I use them in such a
way as putting them into the purepd folder of the subversion? ;)that would be great frank!
Okay, I added them now to trunk/abstractions/purepd
I made a little change in that I added second inlets to both gt~ and lt~ to overwrite the argument.
Additionally I added [gt2~] and [lt2~] variations at the same place which compare 2 signals. They don't accept an argument anymore however.
Are these the fake versions? Within purepd, I don't think that the
fake >~ should be named gt~/lt~ is they are not numerically accurate
copies of the real >~ <~. The idea of the purepd is that they are
exact clones of objects written in Pd. I don't think that library
should be a place for "close enough" clones, unless they are clearly
named.
.hc
Ciao
Frank Barknecht Do You RjDj.me? _
______footils.org__
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies,
one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better
language; and every chapter must be so translated.... -John Donne