Awesome, I can code it based on that :) but which order is it?

I see it has 4 biquads, but it doesnt look like an 8th order because some coefficients are zeroed out, so I'm confused.

Another question, does it work at any sample rate? This question is also aimed to pd's hilbert~ abstraction by the way.

cheers

2016-06-22 17:27 GMT-03:00 katja <katjavetter@gmail.com>:

Hi, Olli Niemitalou has coefficients published for a higher order
'hilbert transformer' on http://yehar.com/blog/, attached is [olli~]
abstraction based on it.

Katja

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres
<porres@gmail.com> wrote:
> Howdy, I'm working on a frequency shifter object (via single sideband
> modulation / complex modulation).
>
> In Max they have a so called "6th order hilbert transformer with a minimum
> of error". In Pd, the hilbert~ abstraction is 4th order. I'm copying the pd
> abstraction for now, but I was hoping to use such a higher order filter and
> also use- but I can't find a source for such a formula. Any help finding it?
>
> thanks
>

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>