Hello all,
> the truth is: it depends on the purpose.Nothing Truer...>> Not defending anything, but just to remind 60 fps of a pointgrey camera is not slow.>for gesture, i consider everything under 200Hz as slow.
surely this is the case for percussion as in your example here:
> by example, things like this have to be done at 1000Hz:
> http://vimeo.com/9598075However, with a minimum of 75fps with a ps3 camera (you can get up to 120fps at 320x240...) you can get very responsive results:It is clear that this project is not as concerned with precise triggers, it is more concerned with continuous control...you just need to find out if what these space&temporal resolutions offer you what you're looking for. (+ solving less robust lighting, which is what really determines if video tracking is the way to go...)best,J_______________________________________________--On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:37 AM, cyrille henry <ch@chnry.net> wrote:
Le 08/01/2011 20:24, Pedro Lopes a écrit :for gesture, i consider everything under 200Hz as slow.
Not defending anything, but just to remind 60 fps of a pointgrey camera is not slow.
including the wiimote 100Hz.
by example, things like this have to be done at 1000Hz:
http://vimeo.com/9598075
(we tried with slower system but it was not possible to be accurate enough).you have problem analysing the image, but dealing with the data is no problem.
you probably will have a lot of trouble in dealing with 60 frames trying to cycle through your code every second.
yep
Accels and other hardware sensors are very useful too, and it very good results.
they will not provide any information regarding 3d positioning.
But not the best for 3d positioning of a point in space,
the question is what information do you really want...
if you want the position of someone in space, then you have to use a camera. but you can also track he's movement with a wacom.
if you want to track it's gesture, then you need something faster. faster than a camera.yep.
but excellent at giving the rotation of that point in space (i.e.: accels, gyros).
cyrille
:)Pd-list@iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@iem.at> mailing list
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 7:21 PM, marcello <wallacechemical@gmail.com <mailto:wallacechemical@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 08/01/11 14:25, cyrille henry wrote:
> hello,
>
> for the kung fu : movement are usually very fast. a camera is usually to
> slow to be useful.
>
> i personally prefer using sensor like accelerometter on the body.
> you can use wiimote or some other (faster) sensors system.
>
> here is a video of a performance i worked for few years ago.
> http://vimeo.com/4596629
> sensors are used at time : 4'57 to 6'06 and from 6'43 to 7'23.
>
> at 6'43, you can see that this kind of sensors are lot's more accurate
> that what you'll be able to do with a camera.
That's a good point about the sensors, I didn't know this camera-latency
problem.
WHat kind of sensor have you used in your work ?
Have you used wireless sensors ?
> imo, camera are good to track body position.
> kinect look to have a sensing zone that is a bit limited.
A combination of the two could be an idea, but then it's complicated to
merge the data...
Thanks for the infos
_______________________________________________contact: pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt <mailto:pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt>
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
Pedro Lopes (MSc)_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
Jaime E Oliver LR
www.jaimeoliver.pe
858 750 0924 (cel)
858 202 1522 (home)
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list