Send Pd-list mailing list submissions to
        pd-list@lists.iem.at

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        pd-list-request@lists.iem.at

You can reach the person managing the list at
        pd-list-owner@lists.iem.at

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Pd-list digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: how to force the DSP call? / set delread~ delay name
      (Alexandre Torres Porres)
   2. netreceive not refreshing values (Michael Karr)
   3. Re: netreceive not refreshing values (IOhannes m zm?lnig)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 21:21:31 -0300
From: Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>
To: Christof Ressi <info@christofressi.com>
Cc: Pd-List <pd-list@lists.iem.at>
Subject: Re: [PD] how to force the DSP call? / set delread~ delay name
Message-ID:
        <CAEAsFmgORBruXDawE-OxkBz9d0T8rVFo9wYx402h9Z4Vk5nBfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Em seg., 1 de mar. de 2021 ?s 22:43, Christof Ressi <info@christofressi.com>
escreveu:

> while we're at it, any reason why not to have a "set" method for [send~]
> and [catch~]? Seems inconsistent
>
> For the same reason why you can't set the name of [delwrite~]
>

I see, I got confused and thought we were supposed to also set the name for
it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20210302/4b4524d0/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 03:36:12 +0100
From: Michael Karr <michael.karr.22@gmail.com>
To: pd-list@lists.iem.at
Subject: [PD] netreceive not refreshing values
Message-ID:
        <CAOH2gpY13KMgiyy3LO-7+mCTp-m_RCy7fyYNa8R3H9PooMEhpw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hello,

I have set up a udp stream (consisting of millions of values), and I would
like to output these values three at a time using number objects. When I
print the output, I get a whole bunch of values, but the number objects
only retain the 1st, 2nd and 3rd value. How can I tell pd to pass these
values until the stream is terminated?

--
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20210303/be9e0928/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 06:42:55 +0100
From: IOhannes m zm?lnig <zmoelnig@iem.at>
To: pd-list@lists.iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] netreceive not refreshing values
Message-ID: <15DAF202-8C27-4CA2-B1E4-3E104C9627E7@iem.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Am 3. M?rz 2021 03:36:12 MEZ schrieb Michael Karr <michael.karr.22@gmail.com>:
>
> like to output these values three at a time using number objects. When
> I
> print the output, I get a whole bunch of values, but the number
> objects
> only retain the 1st, 2nd and 3rd value. How can I tell pd to pass
> these
> values until the stream is terminated?


check out the "list serializer" example in the help for the [list] object.



mfg.hft.fsl
IOhannes




------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Pd-list mailing list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at
to manage your subscription (including un-subscription) see
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


------------------------------

End of Pd-list Digest, Vol 192, Issue 14
****************************************