Well, portaudio was unavoidable (it's the only patch to coreaudio on Mac and ASIO on Windows.) But that doesnt' make a good reason to add yet others.
And yes, I think FUDI is much better than OSC, thank you :)
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:48:29PM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Miller Puckette wrote:
I'm still thinking about it. On the plus side, it would make Pd users' lives easier; on the minus, it would introduce a new library dependence and thus reduce Pd's portability.
Oh yeah. And what do you think you're doing with PortAudio? I don't see Pd depending on an external PortAudio library. Where's the portability problem?
The OSC design is not much better than that of MIDI, in my opinion... it's a pity it's so widely adopted.
Do you mean that FUDI is so much better? How so?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - t?l:+1.514.383.3801, Montr?al QC Canada
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list