So  would it be an updated FUDI or an all new protocol?


On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:15 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig@iem.at> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2013-01-21 23:35, Martin Peach wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to settle on a graphics metalanguage
> rather than translating tcl code to qt or whatever?
>
that's exactly my point: creating a FUDI-style communication from
pd->gui, which can easily be parsed by any GUI-client you wish to use.

something like:
> obj <id> <x> <y> <name> <args>
which will correctly render an object (whether it has rounded corners
or shadows)

fafjrt
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlD+SrEACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQP9QCgpNNq45sjxb86iEI6JC8N8e3d
LQUAn3N9jbI98/e5OOeGIxz+OkE9DaMj
=qQRF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list