I really do enjoy the layout on the Processing site (http://processing.org/), since it is very clean and has lots of pictures and a big fat examples section on the front page. If we are trying to market Pd to new users, this is THE most important thing (as previously asserted).
I also enjoy their utilization of subdomains. We could do this with things like http://gem.puredata.org, http://gridflow.puredata.org
, http://pidip.puredata.org, etc.
Also, it would be best if the forum was attached to the main website by at least a prominent link/redirect, if not actually in server space. But we definitely need more pictures: unless you're trying to show off by running lynx, the internet is not a purely textual medium. Besides, the people who actually DO patch Pd without a GUI probably aren't so interested in visiting a more marketing-oriented site anyway. Maybe we could do
http://nogui.puredata.org?
~Kyle
On 10/16/06, adam armfield <
adamairmailed@yahoo.com> wrote:come on then... requirements gathering whatsit
whats good at the moment?
what needs improving?
how would you like it to be ideally?
discuss
--- Kyle Klipowicz <kyleklip@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please do. Pllllleeeeaaaaassssseeeee!!!!!
>
> ~Kyle
>
> On 10/16/06, adam armfield <adamairmailed@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > well i can do the graphical/design side of a
> redesign,
> > or some of it anyway... as long as i'm not
> bombarded
> > by conflicting requests from lots of people ;-)
> >
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--
http://theradioproject.com
http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())())))
(())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((())))
))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________
_____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______
((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO