10 Mar
2010
10 Mar
'10
5:57 p.m.
On 2010-03-10 17:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Your patch is pretty simple, but it seems to be that the logic of this operation should be based off of the frame clock rather than a delay.
[pix_delay] is a tap-delay (like z~), thus you give it the "samples" (frames) to delay, rather than the time (e.g. [vd~])
fgmkasdr IOhannes