19 Nov
2007
19 Nov
'07
9:24 a.m.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think you can use [route] now for PDP, i.e. you don't need
[pdp_route].
well, [pdp_route] does something different than [route]. it is rather the functionality of [demultiplex] (which can be build with [route] however).
otoh, i _think_ you need [pdp_route] if you run pdp in a separate thread, because else the sync might get confused.
in short: i wouldn't trade [pdp_route] for [route].
mfgad.-sr IOhannes