On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 05:54 -0400, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:59:47PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Now, what about putting each object class of pd in a different package?
I am assuming you mean a different package for each [osc~] [cos] [+] etc.
This would give the user a lot more choice, modularity is flexibility.
But it doesn't seem very practical. Can you tell me of any user who wants that amount of flexibilty and choice?
i'd say, matju's question was more a rhetorical one. why not giving each object class its own pacakage, since this would give you the highest possible amount of flexibility?
i personally would enjoy separate packages for pd and pd-gui, but i most often compile pd myself, so either way wouldn't harm me much. however, i suppose everyone could live with either way.
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de