Thanks, yes, that makes sense. I'm not using the [text] outlets but rather using global sends in [text sequence -g]. A dummy [r #] does the trick in this case.



On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 at 11:17, Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 10:34 +0200, Martin Hiendl wrote:

> I was wondering whether there is a comment function for the [text]
> object that I'm not aware of, or if not, whether that would be a
> useful feature (for handling and navigating large cue-lists for
> example).


How about this:

Mark your comments with a '# '-prefix (mind the space). When parsing
the content of [text], make sure to pipe everything to [route #] and
consider only the right outlet of [route #]. There you go!

Roman_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


--
martinhiendl.com
+49 171 1929188