On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:36 +0200, "András Murányi" muranyia@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 00:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at wrote:
I should, there is a specific question of whether these two are still needed:
http://puredata.info/docs/**developer/64BitLinuxhttp://puredata.info/docs/developer/64BitLinux http://puredata.info/docs/**developer/**BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuI** ntrepidhttp://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuIntrepid
0.43 should work fine on all 64-bit systems (never tested Windows tho).
.hc
Well, do these apply to to 0.42 in any way? If not any more, they can go. However, it could be nice to have a short writeup on the history of 64-bit in Pd, most importantly stating the version from which it does not make a difference any more.
Andras
That's a good idea. As far as I know, Pd vanilla 0.42.5 was the first version that was fully usable on 64-bit. Pd-extended 0.43 is the first version where the all the libs are expected to run on 64-bit (at least on GNU/Linux, still no Gem on Mac OS X). Here's my quick stab at this page and I don't even have a 64-bit OS. Can the 64-bit people add and edit this to something useful :-D
http://puredata.info/docs/64BitSupport
.hc