this whole thread is about a typo?

i have never seen 

[sig~]

|\

[+~]

|\

[+~]

but have often seen 

[sig~]

|\

[*~]

|\

[+~]

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com> wrote:

Chances are Jonathan has already cleaned that up :D (Thanks for all the help file updates J!)

On Jan 19, 2014, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:

From: Pall Thayer <pallthay@gmail.com>

Subject: Re: [PD] signal math explanation

Date: January 18, 2014 at 2:48:04 PM EST

To: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika@yahoo.com>

Cc: pd-list <pd-list@iem.at>, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig@iem.at>

I don't know. I recall seeing it somewhere years ago.

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika@yahoo.com> wrote:

Hi Pall,
     Which help patches?  I haven't seen a single help patch that substitutes strings of [+~] to double the incoming signal where a simple multiplication would do.

I have seen cascades of [+~] for additive synthesis, but that's not the same.

--------

Dan Wilcox

@danomatika

danomatika.com

robotcowboy.com

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list