Thank you very much. That does the trick.

Though, [array random] doesn't seem to be working as I expected. Am I right to think that it should produce the same result as [array quantile] fed with uniformly distributed random values? If so I'm getting very different results here. 

Thanks
Peiman




www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS Feed || Concert News


On 22 November 2013 04:16, Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu> wrote:
I think the patch is occasionally (once every 512 times on average) sending
zero to "array quantile" which then outputs the index of the first nonzero
number in the table -- in this case a point with probability about 1e-45.

Maybe try random 1e8 (or so) and divide by 1e8 to get a more continuous,
less grainy random sample out of the array.

cheers
Miller

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 01:51:19AM +0000, peiman khosravi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone got any experience with [array quantile]?
>
> I'm getting some strange results and I've done everything I can think of.
>
> I've attached a patch that should clarify the problem. Basically,
> sometimes, not always, [array quantile] returns some weird numbers that I
> can't explain.
>
> And a related issue: array random doesn't seem to be doing what it should
> be doing. It returns very different values, compared with quantile fed with
> random values between 0 and 1. Again, there is an example of what I mean in
> the attached patch.
>
> Thanks
> Peiman
>
>
> *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk <http://www.peimankhosravi.co.uk> || RSS Feed
> <http://peimankhosravi.co.uk/miscposts.rss> || Concert News
> <http://spectralkimia.wordpress.com/>*


> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list