9 Jun
2016
9 Jun
'16
2:34 p.m.
On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 14:14 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2016-06-09 10:33, Roman Haefeli wrote:
Sorry if I missed this, but what is the point of displaying incompatible (wrong arch, wrong platform) Deken packages? What would be harmed if they'd be hidden completely? I fail to see the advantage of having the possibility of downloading a package of wrong arch/platform.
like: preparing your patch for offline use on multiple archs, which you currently don't have access to.
or: checking whether the library exists at all, and if I could nag its osx maintainer to give me w32 binaries.
Right. Both makes sense to me.
Roman