hi list,
theoretically if this patch runs a while the number [float] has to
store becomes very high. could this be a (performance-) problem at
one point?
just curious.
Am 10.11.2005 um 00:03 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
On Nov 5, 2005, at 3:33 PM, Marc Lavallée wrote:
Le 5 Novembre 2005 15:22, Max Neupert a écrit :
why don't you use [counter] ?
attached a working version of your construct...
Here's an alternative version
Here's yet another version, just to compare: